Good morning, Pinkies. I just heard the news (calm down, Lissa. Breathe…) In the wake of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force’s new guidelines for mammography screening, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists just announced new recommendations that cut back on Pap smear screening. My blood is boiling, Pinkies. WHAT IS GOING ON? Why are we recommending cutting back on women’s health screening? Don’t get me started (yet). Let me fill you in on the news.
New Pap Smear Guidelines:
- Instead of recommending that Pap smear screening begin after you’re sexually active, new guidelines say that even a sexually active 13 year old should wait until 21 for her first Pap.
- After 21, Pap smears are recommended every 1-2 years until age 30.
- After 30, if you’ve had three consecutively normal Pap smears with no history of a seriously abnormal Pap, new guidelines say you only need to do Paps every three years.
- If you’ve total hysterectomy for benign reasons, new guidelines say you can skip Paps altogether.
- New guidelines recommend quitting Paps sometime between 65-70 if you’ve had three consecutively normal Paps with no abnormal Paps in the past 10 years.
Why the Change?
There is evidence to support the changes. The truth is that you’re unlikely to go from having a normal Pap smear to having cervical cancer in 3 years, even if you contract HPV. Because cervical cancer grows slowly, it’s still likely to be precancerous by the time it gets picked up. And yearly screening does increase the number of procedures performed, and some of those procedures- such as cryotherapy and LEEP procedure can affect fertility and pregnancy in rare cases. Plus, cutting back on Pap smears saves precious health care dollars. And if we’re not saving lots of lives and potentially causing harm by implementing procedures that may not be necessary, why do annual Pap smears?
So these guidelines aren’t positively ludicrous like the new mammogram guidelines that threaten to kill hundreds of thousands of women. I understand why they’re recommending pushing back the age of first Pap smear. HPV, the virus that causes cervical cancer and abnormal Pap smears, is almost ubiquitous among teens. As such, doing Paps will lead to many abnormal results and require colposocopies, biopsies, and possibly treatment such as LEEP procedures, which can affect their pregnancies in the future, leading to scarred cervixes and preterm labor. And many of those abnormalities, if left untreated, would have resolved themselves without treatment.
I can also see why they’ve said that women who have had a hysterectomy can stop getting Paps. After all, they don’t have a cervix. And while there may be scant cervical cells left at the surgical scar inside the vagina, the risk of cervical cancer is exceedingly low.
BUT (and this is a gigantic BUT) there is a GINORMOUS problem here that carries far-reaching consequences for women’s health, and I can’t keep this quiet. Though women come to the gynecologist under the guise of their annual Pap smear, they actually come for WAY more than that.
Here are some examples of issues I handle under the guise of an annual Pap smear exam:
- Sexual problems that threaten your relationship
- Debilitating depression and anxiety
- Chronic fatigue that prevents you from living vitally
- Pelvic pain, often as the result of sexual abuse you have never confessed to anyone until I hold the sacred space for you and invite you to tell the truth
- Urinary incontinence that causes so much shame and embarrassment that you might not leave the house, much less exercise or pursue your dreams
- Menstrual disorders like hemorrhaging or menstrual cramps that cause you to miss work and other important life functions.
- PMS/PMDD that may be hampering a happy life
- Interstitial cystitis symptoms that make you feel like you constantly have a UTI
- Menopausal symptoms that threaten a woman’s relationships, sleep, work, and life
- Relationship counseling
- Parenting advice
- Losing your mojo
And that doesn’t even include the oh-so-necessary annual breast exam, internal pelvic exam to check for ovarian tumors and such, and the opportunity to make sure a woman is up to date on other cancer prevention procedures, such as colonoscopy in older women, or the HPV vaccine for teens.
Now, ACOG does say you should still talk to your doctor about getting an annual pelvic exam. (Thank you ACOG.) But are insurance companies going to cover a routine pelvic exam in the absence of a Pap smear? Are women going to go? So many women will hear these new guidelines and think, “Cool! I can skip the gyno for 3 years!”
By changing its guidelines, ACOG is going against the other main authorities on cervical cancer. The American Cancer Society and the U. S. Preventative Services Task Force both recommend that women get their first Pap test within three years of having sex, or at age 21- whichever comes first.
I respect evidence-based medicine and understand the rationale for these guidelines. I went to Duke and Northwestern and learned all the ivory tower beliefs about practicing based on evidence, not anecdotal speculation or emotion-based care. BUT….
What Do I Think?
Hmmm…I guess I think all the guidelines that have come out this week are missing something critically important in medicine. As leaders in women’s health, what messages are we putting out there? Somewhere along the way, governing bodies in medicine have forgotten the most vital aspect of what we doctors do. When they are reviewing data to make these guidelines, they are focusing only on what “cures” someone. But they have forgotten that there is a difference between healing and curing.
Let’s take a huge leap and assume that cancer screening is completely worthless and doesn’t prevent cancer at all. Is there not some value to the other types of healing work we doctors provide under the pretext of the annual Pap smear? Women don’t make separate appointments to talk about their sex life or whether they’re living as vitally as they might. They lump those things under the umbrella of a Pap smear. Many women feel like they’ve been handed a “You’re worthless” card at birth. I try to extract that card and replace it with a hot pink one that says, “You’re lovable, valuable, beautiful, and worthy.” This kind of work cannot be proven in a scientific study. But is taking away a woman’s excuse to visit her gynecologist taking away that hot pink card as well?
I’m not suggesting we do unnecessary testing or procedures just for the sake of getting a woman in the door. Ultimately, you have to be your own advocate for your health and wellness. But I worry about the far-reaching effects these kinds of guidelines will have for women who misunderstand and fail to hear the part about annual exams still being a critical part of women’s wellness. What if they get lost in the system? Especially underprivileged women, who may not be educated enough to advocate for their own well-being.
My fear is that cutting back on cancer screening will not only increase a woman’s risk of cancer. It may also limit a woman’s access to the kind of healing good doctors can provide. For most of my young patients, I am their primary care provider. The Pap smear is what gets them in the door. If you hear that you only need a Pap smear every three years, you may go three years without anyone talking to you about whether you’re living as healthfully and joyfully as you possibly can.
And you can be sure that insurance will cut back your coverage. If ACOG says you don’t need a Pap smear, your visit will likely only get covered if you have an ICD-9 code diagnosis like endometriosis or fibroids. And let me tell you- there’s no ICD-9 diagnosis for losing your mojo or cancer prevention.
You may think I’m biased. After all, I’m a gynecologist. It’s my business to have people come in for Pap smears, so of course, I would oppose these new guidelines. But the truth is that most gynecologists lose money by doing a Pap smear. The cost of the visit exceeds what insurance companies will reimburse most of the time. And since Medicare already doesn’t cover annual Paps, we usually eat the cost for older women who want to get Pap smears but don’t have coverage. So trust me, for most gynecologists, this is not about money. One of my dear friends in San Francisco (a total Pink God) is closing his practice- declaring bankruptcy- because he simply can’t make ends meet with a busy insurance-based practice. It breaks my heart. He is one of those doctors who, like me, practices love, with medicine on the side. Why does the system not embrace him? Why have we replaced doctors like him with technology, scientific data, and task forces? (*crying now*)
And why are they cutting back on only women’s health screening? Why not PSA testing for men? Not to be all conspiracy-theorist on you, but you can’t convince me that there aren’t some sexual politics caught up in all this. With all the advances we’ve made in women’s rights and women’s health over the years, why are we going backwards? Won’t somebody please stand up and shine the light on the Emperor’s new clothes?
I get that we need to cut back on health care costs. But come on, people. Must we do it at the expense of women? Can’t we focus our energy on tort reform or capping profits for insurance companies. Is this really the way?
For me, it’s all about advocating for holistic women’s health- the big kind, the kind that looks at a whole human being, not just a breast or a cervix. The only way we can help women holistically is to get them into our offices, provide a safe, sacred space for healing, and show up- fully present- to help them get in touch with what their body needs to be whole.
What Will I Do In My Practice?
I think you should be given a choice. The way I see it, it’s my job to present the data and help you understand the risks and benefits of cancer screening. If you want to get a yearly Pap smear and mammograms after 40- Fine. If you’d prefer to stretch out your screening or skip it altogether, no problem. It’s your body- your choice. I’m just here to help you understand your options and deal with whatever comes up.
The Bottom Line
Please, Pinkies, regardless of what you decide to do about your Pap smear or your mammogram, please don’t stop seeing a doctor every year.
Our Broken System
Thinking of how these new guidelines may limit your access to health care breaks my heart.
This system is so BROKEN. Hand me the suture and a needle driver. I want to stitch the fragmented, fractured, hemorrhaging heart of medicine back together again.
Waiting, with hand outstretched- “Suture, please,”
Lissa
Tags: acog, american cancer society, american college of obstetricians and gynecologists, cancer, cancer prevention, cervical cancer, cryotherapy, doctor-patient relationship, endometriosis, fertility, fibroids, gynecologist, healer, HPV, LEEP, mammograms, medical system, medicare, ob/gyn, pap smear, pap smear guidelines, pap smear screening, precancerous, pregnancy, us preventative services task force, uti



























If this isn’t insurance company/cost-cutting related, I will truly be shocked. That’s the underlying impetus for almost everything in our country these days – we are a far more capitalistic society than democratic.
I agree completely with what you said. Women don’t go to the doctor for yearly physicals, the OB/GYN is the one opportunity a lot of women get with a doctor. My doctor is hilarious, I quite adore her. She likes to say they wrestle women in once a year for birth control refills.
It’s incredibly sad that they’re going after preventative care for women. I don’t even have words for how it makes me feel.
I refuse to believe that the new “guidelines” have nothing to do with health care reform. At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy minded person, I can picture now the back room handshakes that got this rolling. Insurance companies asked for and got what they wanted: figure out a way to reduce what we are recommended to provide and we’ll stop spending millions of dollars a day to block health care reform.
What about the women that are saved by doing the screenings? Has health care really become so about numbers that they don’t count? The odds say that we spend a lot to save a few? Seriously???
So upset I’m irrational, but I’m making an appointment with my OB/Gyn to get screened, tested and examined before my over priced, under insured health plan tells me I can’t. Oh, that’s right I haven’t met my deductible yet and will have to pay for it anyway. Thank heaven for small favors.
Amber George
I’m with you both on this, Erin and Amber.
I’m PISSED OFF.
Don’t get me started.
Okay- do. Someone needs to shine a light on this. Women need to speak. Eve Ensler? Someone? Step up to the plate!
I am SO delighted that the medieval-style practices of clamping and radiating delicate breast tissue, and inserting metal tongs into the vagina are unraveling. I would like to see statistics of women who had regular clamping tests and the proportion of those women that developed breast cancer. It seems the countries that are doing this test are the ones where breast cancer is rampant.
Since HPV is sexually transmitted then let those concerned about their activities get tested as with other sexually transmitted diseases. Why subject the whole female population to this desperate medical/medieval practice?
Women really need to do their homework on medical practices and note who is doing and funding the “research”.
A pap smear saved my life. Without a LEEP those nasty little cells would have continued to grow and who knows, I might have gotten cancer.
As I said earlier, this nonsense is a precursor to the kinds of rationing every American will see should this health care garbage pass (and I pray it does not). Everyone will see an increase in cost and a decrease in service.
Conspiracy? Who knows but this just adds one more item to my “It’s Sucks to be a Girl” list.
OMG i am soooo PISSED right along with you Lissa.. this is going soo back to the 50’s when it was well ur the little woman and property almost! OMG!
As someone who has had suspicious paps a few times and had an endometrial ablation 13 yrs ago..and yes one of the 10% who has NEVER ever had another period..This yearly exam is a must for women, its i’m sorry a plot to undervalue women yet more. Mens testing is paid for.. because MEN RUN THESE COMPANIES.. If we are going to cut health care costs.. stop scamming insurance companies/medicare for stuff that is never done but billed by some docs for money.
Women of this country need to start protesting again and loudly, we got the vote, we’ve still not got equal pay as men or our voices heard.. its time to unite as woman and storm this countries leaders with OHH HELL NO
WE’RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT..NO WE AIN’T GONNNA TAKE IT, WE’RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT ANYMORE….
The music lover/dj couldn’t resist that line….
Anne,
Thanks for sharing your perspective. I am glad that the tests, no matter how “medieval” they may appear to be, do exist and that women visit their doctor for them. Those tests saved both of my grandmothers, one of them twice, my step mother, myself and several friends. As every woman does, you can chose not to have the exams, but I think that they value can’t be underestimated.
I too have had a LEEP after years of abnormal pap smears. And yes, it’s from HPV- an STD I got from my husband. This is not some disease of hoochies and ‘ho’s. They estimate 80% of women will get HPV in their lifetime, so while I hear you Anne, we just don’t know when we might be exposed unless we’re celibate. And there are cases of adenocarcinoma of the cervix that are completely unrelated to HPV, so skipping Paps- even if you’re celibate- is taking a big risk I would never want to take.
But that’s just me. When it comes right down to it, every woman should have the right to assess the data, talk to her doctor and make a choice that resonates with her.
The sad thing is that we all see where this is heading: insurance denials of coverage. They are taking away our choice to have these tests, unless we pay put of pocket.
We should have the choice to have or not have the screenings.
I agree, Erin.
I’m all for universal health care coverage, but what I see if that certain health care will be considered a right (treatment for a heart attack) while other things (like Paps and mammograms) may be considered a privilege that you must pay for out of pocket. Seems a little ass backwards to me.
There’s gotta be a better way. What does that look like?
It seems to me like for-profit insurance, out of control healthcare technology costs (if you don’t use the latest and greatest technology you’ll get sued for malpractice), and lawyers have all inserted themselves into what was once an interpersonal relationship between patients and doctors.
Doctors have been forced into a position where they are mechanics for the body, isolating sickness and attempting to cure those sicknesses. But most doctors didn’t go into the field because they wanted to follow instruction manuals to fix parts, they went into it because they wanted to heal people. And patients aren’t satisfied being poked, proded, and prescribed meds in the impersonal production line atmosphere of most medical offices seeking to cover costs with lower and lower insurance reimbursements, higher malpractice costs, and the need to buy the latest and greatest new gadgets.
The healthcare system isn’t going to be fixed until some effort it made to reestablish the sacred contract between doctor and patient, where doctors focus on healing the patient, not merely curing their current ailment, and where the patient feels that the doctor has had the time to see them as a whole person.
Unfortunately, deep pocketed health insurance companies, healthcare technology companies, and legal lobbies are dominating the debate. These are not people looking to restore that sacred contract. They are seeking instead to validate their middleman status and continue to divert healthcare dollars away from healing and into their own pockets.
Fortunately, there are people out there who see this need, and who are finding their own unique ways to restore this sacred contract. Here is a great article about a doctor in Oregon who has set up a wonderful office where she is successfully doing this http://bit.ly/40ilUj.
Thank you Lissa, for sharing your thoughts on the subject. We need more doctors out there like you and Dr. Wible who want to see sanity restored to the system.
Yes, honey. Amen to that. (Disclaimer, Pinkies! Matt Klein is my husband so, uh, he’s heard me rant a few times. Plus he’s wathced me try to survive- and ultimately leave- a very busy managed care practice that no longer served my patients or me the way I felt called to practice medicine. Let’s just say I agree with everything Matt said!)
Pamela Whible is a rock star! Kudos to her! I’m tempted to hop on a plane, fly to Oregon, and give her a gigantic hug.
And Matt- lovely to hear your voice here.
I LOVE YOU!
xoxo
Lissa
If one man can help you, I stand with you over the issues of mammograms and pap smears. If it makes you feel any better, though, the Journal of the AMA has in fact questioned the need for annual prostate screenings for men. New guidelines for practitioners may be closer than you think.