Owning Pink Bloggers

You'll never face something in life that you can't handle.

Are You A Cognitive Validator Or A Flaming Mystic?

Lissa Rankin's picture

Validator or Mystic

When I went through the spiritual experience I wrote about here, a part of me simply couldn’t handle it. Some of the events that unfolded in the wake of The Experience made absolutely no sense to my cognitive mind, which I have come to trust. How can you dissolve clouds with your intention? How can you telepathically communicate with people and animals? How can objects speak to you? How is it possible that sand was moving around us when nothing in the sand was moving? How is it that I can suddenly stay underwater without breathing three times longer than I could a month ago? How did my perfectly cognitive scientist friend Dennis suddenly become psychic?

And why did this all happen?

When I was asking these kinds of questions to Rachel Naomi Remen, Rachel said, “Perhaps understanding how and why are the booby prize.”

Ouch. What if I’ve spent my whole life in search of something that really doesn’t matter. Double ouch.

The Quest For Understanding

The last eight years have been a journey of trying to explain that which is hard to explain. I was very proud of myself for researching and writing Mind Over Medicine, which offers scientific proof explaining the how and why of the body’s seemingly magical ability to heal itself sometimes with what doctors like to call “spontaneous remissions.” I’m currently researching and writing my next book, The Fear Cure about the scientific proof that fear not only makes you miserable; it makes you sick, and how courage can heal. I can prove this theory with cold hard data, and I can explain the physiological mechanism by which this happens. This makes my cognitive mind happy and leaves me feeling safe with how the world works.

Then something like this “kundalini awakening” happens (I explained it here) and mystical things are suddenly happening which defy those pesky laws of physics. This makes my cognitive mind go batty and leaves me feeling very very unsafe. What if everything I thought was true about the world really wasn’t? Then who am I? What can I hang my hat on? What do I get to hold onto?

Cognitive Validators Vs. Intuitives 

When Rachel and I were talking about this, she said, “Lissa, we each have a part of ourselves that we trust - our frontrunner. When we come into a new situation, we send different parts of ourselves in first to check out the scene. The cognitive person sends in their cognitive self.  Who’s there? How reliable are they? Let’s suppose it’s not the cognitive mind that you trust? What if you trust the heart? What if you send your heart in as the frontrunner? What’s the vibe in here? Are they loving? Are they connecting? Are they competing? The thing that’s difficult is that a smaller part of you cannot validate a larger part of you easily. So if you’re a cognitive validator, you can’t validate the soul with cognition. You can validate cognition with the soul, but not the opposite. We must use the cognitive mind as a servant of the soul rather than the soul being okayed by the cognitive mind.”

Rachel says that, as children, when we don’t feel safe, we go cognitive. It makes us feel like we have some control over the world.

Rachel went on to say, “In our culture, we trade off mystery for mastery, but in doing so, we choose deadness over aliveness. What stops the world is our quest for certainty. To the cognitive mind, everything has to be complete. What you’re looking for is something that is not growing, something that is not changing, we swap certainty for aliveness. These are bad trades. These trades don’t make us happy. When we make these tradeoffs for certainty or mastery, we disconnect from the soul.”

Oy. Triple ouch.

10 Ways Your Soul Guides You In Daily Life

In our free teleclass 10 Ways Your Soul Guides You In Daily Life (you can sign up here), Rachel came out in front of 21,000 as a “flaming mystic.” We explained that Rachel and I view the world in very different ways. I am a cognitive validator. I feel safe when I understand things, so when I went through The Experience with April and Dennis, my soul felt total ecstasy, Divine Oneness, union with God consciousness, but to the smaller part of myself, my whole world felt threatened. It’s funny, really, when you think about it. Dennis and I are both scientists, so to have this experience happen to us must be hysterical to the Cosmos. I can just see Universal Intelligence plucking us up like tulip bulbs and saying, “Hey, look at these two. Let’s play a little game and blow their cognitive minds to smithereens!”

Dennis and I were blown radically open, humbled by what we don’t understand and can’t explain.

Rachel, on the other hand, has no need to explain the unexplainable. It’s easier for her to be comfortable with uncertainty, as is the case for many mystics and intuitives. Frankly, I’m jealous. I wish my cognitive mind would just get the hell outta dodge and leave me with my unexplainable ecstasy.

I’ve since spoken to many people who lead with their intuition and have trouble understanding us small-minded cognitive validators. They’re comfortable with magic. It thrills them, actually. They don’t need to be able to explain mystery, and they’re in awe at what is possible when we don’t need to explain how or why.

I think I agree with Rachel. Perhaps how and why are the booby prize, and when we trade mystery for mastery, it’s a bad trade.

I feel incredibly blessed to have shown how wrong I am. My intention from here on is to be outrageously open to the mystery. It may be a rocky road, because my cognitive mind will still try to explain what it can. But I hope it will let me move beyond it, without putting up so much resistance to that which is beyond explanation.

Rachel is going to be teaching all of us how to make this shift in the 6 week teleclass series we’re leading together Medicine For The Soul: Reclaiming & Trusting Your True Self. So if your soul is telling you you’d benefit from learning with us, we invite you to join us on this adventure. Enrollment for the class ends today, February 17th, at 12 noon Pacific Standard Time.

Are You A Cognitive Validator Or A Flaming Mystic?

I’d LOVE to hear your perspectives and learn from you all. Please share your thoughts and stories.

Trying to free myself from my small mind,

Lissa

Lissa Rankin, MD is a mind-body medicine physician, founder of the Whole Health Medicine Institute training program for physicians and other health care providers, the New York Times bestselling author of Mind Over Medicine: Scientific Proof That You Can Heal Yourselfand the host of the hit National Public Television special Heal Yourself: Mind Over Medicine (link). Lissa blogs at LissaRankin.com, teaches teleclasses (link) with luminaries like Martha Beck, Rachel Naomi Remen, Amy Ahlers, and Tosha Silver, and has sparked a movement to revolutionize health care at HealHealthCareNow.com. She is also the author of two other books, a professional artist, an amateur ski bum, a lover of dancing, and an avid hiker. Lissa lives in the San Francisco Bay area.

n/a

Comments

Jennie's picture

a thought

A thought I had in reading this is that your need for cognitive validation may not only be a personality style, but may have been ingrained in you because of your personal history (father being a physician) and your training. In medical school, you're often taught that only empirically validated treatments are good enough. I wonder if this led to a tendency to prove prove prove your points, even if that might not be your natural strategy? I personally, like Rachel, do not have the need to explain the mystical, but in my field of work, which highly emphasizes research, I feel pressure to do so.

Jennie's picture

a thought

A thought I had in reading this is that your need for cognitive validation may not only be a personality style, but may have been ingrained in you because of your personal history (father being a physician) and your training. In medical school, you're taught that only empirically validated treatments are good enough. I wonder if this led to a tendency to prove prove prove your points, even if that might not be your natural strategy? I personally, like Rachel, do not have the need to explain the mystical, but in my field of work, which highly emphasizes research, I feel pressure to do so.

When you comment on an Owning Pink blog post, we invite you to be authentic and loving, to say what you feel, to hold sacred space so others feel heard, and to refrain from using hurtful or offensive language. Differing opinions are welcomed, but if you cannot express yourself in a respectful, caring manner, your comments will be deleted by the Owning Pink staff.