
I started to write this post sitting at home in Oakland, CA on Thursday evening, July 8, helicopters overhead and sirens in the streets as our city reacted to the verdict of the Oscar Grant-Johannes Mehserle trial. The ruling of Involuntary Manslaughter in this case (of a white police officer fatally shooting a young black male -- who was unarmed, cuffed, and already on the ground) is largely viewed as unjust. The community has been bracing itself for this verdict for weeks. I, for one, am left speechless. Which is usually a good time for me to start writing.
So, here goes.
Ok, full disclosure.
When something like this happens – huge, historical, controversial, tragic – you lose me. Not because I’m not interested, but because it’s almost too sad for me to comprehend. And yes, because I feel like everyone in the world automatically knows more about it than I do. Who are you to talk about the oil spill? my inner critic screams. What the heck do you know about the Middle East? Or in this case, Hey white girl, care to comment on Oscar Grant?
I stopped writing this post on Thursday so that I could watch the crowd gather at the corner of 14th and Broadway, outside the office building where I’ve been teaching music to Oakland high school students for the last year. I stopped writing because I wanted to experience what I was feeling in the moment instead of already trying to document it. I stopped writing because I was scared – what if I say the wrong thing? What if I don’t have all of the facts? What if I offend people? And sure, let’s allow the ego to run rampant for a moment: this is my first actual blog on Owning Pink – is this really how I want to introduce myself into the Pink blogosphere? With an emotionally-charged topic on which I feel I have zero authority? Who the heck am I to comment on Oscar Grant?
Well folks, who am I NOT to comment? I don’t know how we get through times like these if we all don’t pull ourselves up by the bootstraps and get to talking. So when I woke up Friday to headlines of Oakland riots and looting, my fear and ego were trumped by a healthy dose of anger. Here goes.
What will you do?
The scene in Oakland started peacefully, though tense. Earlier Thursday afternoon, word got out that the verdict would be announced at 4:00pm and the city erupted with people getting the heck out of dodge. Immediately, the media coverage struck me as odd – this was more about how Oakland would react to the verdict than the verdict itself. When “involuntary manslaughter” came across every screen (and appeared in every Facebook status message of my friends), I watched as the Oakland exodus shifted from getting out, to getting in.
Hundreds gathered at Civic Center plaza, but it was strange – the peaceful protesters just were not giving the media what it seemed to so desperately want. Many people refused interviews and walked away from the questioning news anchors, and I watched as the cameras panned over the speakers promoting peace and unity to catch whatever scuffle could be erupting as the police presence increased.
And increase it did. Lines of officers in riot gear unraveled onto Broadway; from the aerial view of the helicopters they indeed resembled toy soldiers. And you know what? They felt scarier than any of the potential chaos they were there to contain.
Perfect storm
The irony of a police presence at a rally protesting the unjust behavior of police is, well, undeniable. But how do you deal with this situation? Of course I understand why they were there. And, like our service men and women in the army, I have the utmost respect for those who choose to protect and serve even though it is not a choice I make for myself (nor a system I believe is unflawed).
So here is this perfect storm. A sea of tense but peaceful community members, lines of cops in shields and masks, and the media chanting, what will you do? What will you do?
Here to listen
As the cameras panned the storm, I noticed a man wearing a white t-shirt with simple black lettering that read, “Here To Listen.” My dear friend Kara, who was at the rally, told me that she saw several people with similar shirts, and a group of community volunteers in orange vests who had been trained to assist, organize, and be. Here to listen.
How do we hold space for this kind of anger? How do we hold space for this kind of tragedy – both the unbelievable killing of Oscar Grant and the system of justice for Officer Mehserle? The media and police shouted what will you do, but Kara says the protesters also questioned each other – what CAN we do?
I would never condone any kind of violence and I am indeed devastated by the looting that ruptured as soon as the sun went down. (For the record, published reports state that of the 78 arrested, only 19 were Oakland residents. One was my friend’s step-mom, who was simply rounded up in the chaos.) But I do have to say that I understand the need to acknowledge and process rage. That to go immediately from hearing this news to We Shall Overcome just doesn’t feel real. That to skip the stage of anger in fear that it will lead to violence is not an authentic way of processing these events. Must we burn buildings? I don’t know. Must we turn on each other to show the police that they have no real power? At what cost? Shall we open every gymnasium in the Bay Area for access to punching bags? Heck, maybe.
Holding space
I couldn’t write this piece until I acknowledged my own fear (and yeah, that fear is still there!). If I may stretch this metaphor – I don’t know how we, as a community, can move forward in peace until we are able to acknowledge our anger. They are not separate. For me, being the change I want to see in the world means owning every authentic emotion – devastation, fear, elation, and you betcha, a healthy dose of rage. Do I feel that our communities are most strongly united in joy? Yes, I do. But not by sweeping anger under the rug. Besides, that rug is a transparent bugger, and rage has a funny way of billowing up through its seams…
What do you think, Pinkies? How do you hold space for anger – both in your personal life and at the community/political/universal levels? How do you hold space for all of your feelings, even when they are conflicting?
They said we would respond like animals and put a plan in place to round us up when we did. I left the rally as soon as I saw the writing on the walls. Then sat here helpless as I watched on the news the trap close in on the people of my city who, still thinking we were making a statement, set fires and smashed windows in lock step with the diagram of our disobedience that had been drawn up days ago. And a big part of me wishes I hadn't left. That I had stayed and broken and burned and been arrested because now I don't know what to do with all of this anger and embarrassment. – Daveed Diggs, “Notes from a Rally/Riot” July 8, 2010
Here to listen,
Lauren
When you comment on an Owning Pink blog post, we invite you to be authentic and loving, to say what you feel, to hold sacred space so others feel heard, and to refrain from using hurtful or offensive language. Differing opinions are welcomed, but if you cannot express yourself in a respectful, caring manner, your comments will be deleted by the Owning Pink staff.
Comments
So many subjects
By Scott Sheperd (not verified) on Thursday, 07/15/2010 at 1:05 PMFirst of all - great post. I know the feeling of trying to get your head around something when it feels like your head will probably just explode. As I read your post and the responses as well, it just struck me that there really were a lot of subjects that could be talked about. How a lifetime of injustice can affect a single moment in time for good or bad; what do we do with anger; is anger something that really happens to us or is it something that we trigger through thought processes, some very subtle; what can we bring to a discussion when we are really peripheral to the components; how does society change? and I'm sure many others.
A post that can trigger all these areas is pretty powerful.
One interesting thought that comes to me is how we do discuss these issues. The responses to you were pretty much in agreement. How do we handle the disagreements. I've noticed in many places a tendency to immediately resort to name calling. "You're a sexist, or you're a socialist, or . . . you get the point. To disagree and discuss is something I really don't think we're very good at. And perhaps that becomes one small reason out of many others that violence, physical and verbal, becomes attractive. It's easier.
Great job.
I've been thinking about this
By Melanie Bates on Tuesday, 07/13/2010 at 3:33 PMI've been thinking about this post since yesterday (WOW - your first piece here was a doozie!) and that's always a good thing for me. It means it's burrowed in deep and I need to reflect. What I realized, in a nutshell, was that I really suck at expressing my anger. I feel it, of course I do, but I never allow it to just be and I certainly never express it. I had always heard that anger is not a real emotion, that it's a cover-up for another, deeper emotion. I think, after reading this, that idea is flawed. Yes, it's a "cover-up" emotion to a certain extent but you have to feel it and express it sometimes to get to the deeper emotion.
Melanie Bates
Femme Tales - Truth with Humor
I wish...
By Laura (not verified) on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 4:01 PMI wish that all protests could be peaceful, that is not to say denying the rage, because denying that would not support anything. However, in my perfect world, violence would stop violence not add to it.
This case has been a challenging one for me. The compassionate one sees both sides. I just appreciate your speaking your heart about it Lauren and all of you Pinky's sharing in the conversation.
In peace,
Laura Fenamore
P.S.The dalai lama writes, "Western Civilization these days places great importance on filling the human "brain" with knowledge, but no one seems to care about filling the human "heart" with compassion."
Thank you for this
By kasey (not verified) on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 12:05 PMLauren,
Thank you so much for putting in words a lot of what I have been feeling. I am also an Oaklander and have been trying to process my conflicting emotions about last week's verdict and trying to figure out where I fit in to the dialogue, if at all.
What made me the most angry was the constant buzz of news helicopters. That and the continuous sound of sirens really fueled a rage within me. It felt like listening to vultures hovering, waiting for the inevitable carcass on which they could feed. It was clear from the news coverage that the media so wanted another tragic story to report on. Oscar Grant wasn't enough. There needed to be a riot.
I have chosen to handle my anger by unplugging and by talking to people in my community. We've learned a lot from the people who get into our car for casual carpool in the morning. Some of it utterly shocking, but more real than anything I see on the news. It's made me really re-think a lot of my ideas about what's going on in Oakland.
And to Lakenda's point, this verdict is in many ways amazing and unprecedented.
And while his sentence will be short, based on work I've done in the California prisons, I know it will be brutal for him. I'm not saying this to indicate that I'm satisfied with the verdict because his time will be hard, I'm saying it because it is a component that not a lot of people realize. Mehserle will be lucky if he comes out a better person. Odds are that he will come out broken. I suppose my anger from this situation really comes from a look at society. What kind of society wants a riot to break out? And what would be the best way to compensate Oscar Grant's family?
Though, Lakenda's note that society doesn't change in a day is well-taken. I will hold out hope that we are heading towards a more compassionate place. But to do so, I think we all need to look at the anger in our own hearts and find healthy, creative ways to address it.
Thank you for such a thought-provoking post.
I'm with you!
By Lauren Nagel on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 3:42 PMKasey,
Thank you so much for responding -- see, you absolutely fit into the dialogue! We all do. (Although, as you read, it took me writing that post to realize it for myself.)
I'm even more saddened to think about Mehserle's time in prison. How does he heal? What is the point? Will "breaking" him = justice? This is the part when my eyes glaze over and I just want to stop paying attention, because it's too difficult to wrap my brain around, and my heart around, and what do I know...
But we both must stick with it, Kasey. Because we are a part of this dialogue - as Oakland residents, as citizens, as HUMANS. Talking with people in your casual carpool is a wonderful way to get the conversation going. And even if you don't feel, on any particular day, like you have something to say... we can always be here to listen...
With love and thanks,
L
Accepting Anger Does Not Mean Burning.
By Lakenda Wallace on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 11:05 AMAnger is a great emotion because it allows us to recognize that we are not feeling respected. It is our bodies red flag of warning, "Hey, the situation is dissing you." However, there are plenty of ways to deal with anger besides looting and burning—or even punching a punching bag.
Yes, it needs expression. Writing, protesting, organizing, using your God-given talents to find ways to change the situation. Looting a Footlocker seems more about new shoes than an expression of anger.
Now, I'm also an Oaklander. I have watched the unfolding of the events surrounding the untimely and completely senseless death of Oscar Grant. And, I'm black (you may have noticed). Well, now I'm going to type something absolutely shocking that, as a black Oaklander I have kept under my hat since Thursday's explosion of emotion....
The world does not change in a day. With every single event we evolve, moving closer (God willing) to great compassion and understanding. So, that said, how is it that we are outraged that Mehserle got convicted of Involuntary Manslaughter? This is the first time in history that a police officer has been charged for a crime because of conduct on the job. Not some hushed internal investigation. A group (police, prosecuters, judges) have indicted and convicted one of their own—another first! No, he didn't get the max sentence. But the world does not shift 180 degrees overnight. He was convicted for killing a black man, as an African American I can tell you that is UNPRECEDENTED.
So rather than mourning the life of Oscar Grant or supporting his family in their time of grief, a handful of miscreants has chosen to "wait til after dark" to loot and destroy, despite Grant's family asking for peace.
Anger is a red flag, but not an excuse. We are not animals. We can think with higher minds and direct that energy any way we want to. The fact is, a handful of folks unable or unwilling to control themselves and be respectful has reinforced in the police's minds that riot police are needed in Oakland, that black folks can't control themselves, that we prefer to raid FootLockers for sneakers that find real solutions to the problems that plague us.
As you can see, I, too, am angry. But I use this anger to do healing work on my community, to teach others to do healing work and to write (albeit, a bit of a rant) in the hopes of enlightening.
My prayer is that in times of angst, anger and grief we choose to talk to those who will listen compassionately to work through our anger to solutions. My prayer is that we can take a moment to see just how far we have come, rather than only seeing how far we have to go. My prayer is that we see that the business owner trying to feed his family is no more to blame for the actions of the police than your grandmother. My prayer is that respect make a reappearance. Amen.
Love & Blessings,
Lakenda, a.k.a. Good Witch
GoodWitch BadWitch.com
StillSitting.NET, Less Stress, More
I hear you
By Lauren Nagel on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 3:29 PMOh Lakenda, thank you so much for sharing your thoughts here. I too thought a lot about the unprecedented nature of the verdict, and tried to seek comfort in the small movement forward. However, I can't help but think of this story from college -- and forgive the rather shallow metaphor here but I think you'll understand what I mean --
My college roommate was dating a guy who was a real a--hole. Just, stellar. He constantly berated her, was rude to all of her friends, really made her question her self-worth, etc. One of the more exceptional douchebags I've ever had the pleasure of encountering. And one day he held the door open for her. And there was such glee in her eyes - such unfathomable joy that a person this rude could do something that was, well, NORMAL. And this normal gesture was magnified and exaggerated because it was, you know, him. And so he was profusely congratulated for being halfway decent.
So. You see where I'm going with this. Of course I am, without a doubt, blown away that Mehserle was not acquitted altogether. It IS a huge step forward. But I also don't want to magnify this step because of the context in which it occurs. And I just don't know how to hold the emotions of both, you know?
My prayer is for patience. My prayer is for the grace to celebrate the gratitude of this moment with the hope for more changing moments of the future.
Thank you for holding this space, Lakenda!
xoxoxo
Widening the lens
By Joy Mazzola on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 9:58 AMSo since the verdict, part of what I've been holding onto is a bitter notion of humanity - how people love getting angry (or offended, or outraged, or defiant, or self-righteous) in response to seeming injustices, and how unproductive that is. How (as I wrote in response to Lakenda's post) the instinct to 'fight' serves no one.
Buuut ... this piece is widening the lens on my so-called 'perspective.' For one thing, the injustice is only 'seeming' to me in this case because not one part of my experience (save living in the bay area and being, ya know, human) touches one part of the experience of the people whom this is personally affecting. I am very much outside looking in ... I was one of those people watching the news (for the first time in years) on Thursday evening with an air of expectation - of what, I don't know. I couldn't relate to the anger because (a) I'm so averse to anger in general and (b) I have no direct idea what the verdict awoke (or exacerbated) in millions of people. Thank you for reminding me about compassion - even (or especially) toward people to whose experience I can't necessarily relate.
Also, I feel immensely hypocritical because I've learned (and keep learning) that the only way to have this here human experience is to feel what we feel. Whatever it is. Even if it makes no sense. Even if it seems counter-productive. You can't skip over the feelings. Sure, you can try (many do - me included) but that leads to stuff that's even less helpful. Oy.
I loved this line the most: "I stopped writing because I wanted to experience what I was feeling in the moment instead of already trying to document it." Your whole piece speaks to presence, compassion, and truth. You are a wise bird, me darlin. It's a blessing to be able to learn from you every single day.
Love you kookily,
Joy
Lauren...
By Megan Monique Harner on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 7:51 AMI had an uncontrollably reaction of tears flowing from this post. I was interested in what this was all about since you sent the email out asking for prayers. (I hadn't heard anything about it here in Texas.)
I am left speechless now, really about what to say. I believe there is a shift going on in the world. To some degree, some of us are more aware of what is working and what is not.
Thank you for sharing your voice on this matter. I enjoyed hearing it. Welcome to the Owning Pink Blogosphere.
Wow
By Lauren Nagel on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 9:26 AMWhat's sad to me is that this news isn't hitting Texas! (Until now, of course.) Thank you so much for reading and for sharing your authentic response. The more conversation, the more change... Love you, muffin. (And thanks for the welcome!)
Holding Space
By Keith Leach (not verified) on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 7:33 AMWonderful piece on what begs to be asked by each and every one of us. And thank you, Lauren, for taking us there, at your own expense. Well said!!
Thank you!
By Lauren Nagel on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 9:24 AMThanks, Keith! I'm happy to go there with the company of supportive folks like you. xoxoxo
YES!
By Lissa Rankin on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 6:27 AMLauren,
First let me say as one who hired you to be Editor-in- Pink without every actually reading much of what you've written, YEAH!!! I did good- and you did GREAT! What a fabulous piece. So timely and real and true. The anger is such an important piece for us to experience in order to move onto joy.
I remember when my ex-husband Kirk and I got divorced, it was so ridiculously amicable that we spent the night we made the decision going out to dinner and ordering for each other before walking back home arm in arm. Then I started wondering why the hell we were breaking up? I ultimately had to get pissed. This guy let me down. He wasn't emotionally available to me when I needed him. He gave up before we barely began. He wouldn't go to marriage counseling with me. (Of course, there's an equal list of ways I failed him). We both got angry. We quit talking for months.
But once we got through that phase, we went on to become best buds, post break up until his new girlfriend put the kibbutz on it.
After that, I realized that I often need to process my anger before I can move on to acceptance, friendship, and peace.
Thanks for a great reminder of how Oakland needs to heal.
And welcome! It's official! You're a Pinkie!
xoxo
Lissa
Word, Lissa.
By Lauren Nagel on Monday, 07/12/2010 at 9:23 AMThank you, Lissa! The story about your amicable divorce is a great example of how we tend to bury the hatchet before we, you know, acknowledge the hatchet. Sometimes we just need to say, HEY, this is a freakin' HATCHET.
Thanks again for your welcoming and official knighting of Pinkyhood (and for hiring me - hee!).
xoxoxo