

We have not been able to stop talking about The Wall Street Journal essay by Amy Chua, Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior -- an excerpt from her recently published book, Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother (Penguin Press 2011). "Can a regimen of no playdates, no TV, no computer games and hours of music practice create happy kids? And what happens when they fight back?" Check out Suzzane's fabulous post on the topic as well, and join the conversation!
When I read Amy Chua’s article, my blood started to boil. Now given, my five year-old daughter goes to a Waldorf school, which is arguably the diametrically opposed opposite of growing up with a Chinese mother, so I'm probably not her target audience. Kids in my daughter's school are nurtured, hugged, coddled even. But they also love school and work hard to earn the faith, love and trust they are given unconditionally by their teachers and their parents. Will the Waldorf method work for my child? I don't know. I know a lot of Western kids grow up entitled, spoiled, lazy, fat, and unfocused. And I know Chinese kids tend to be better at math, science, and music. But at what price?
Kids are only children for so long, and really, as parents, what is our goal? To raise prodigies who hate themselves? Or to raise happy children? Sure, my loving, nurturing, accepting approach to parenting may backfire on me. My daughter may fail academically, never excel at anything, and wind up in therapy with an eating disorder and suicidal tendencies. I can’t know now what will work and what won’t.
But I’m not willing to sell out her childhood in order to make her get straight A’s or wind up at Juilliard. My sole goal is for her to grow up knowing in her heart of hearts that she is loving and lovable, that she is whole and vital, that her life matters and that she’s here for a reason, and that her mother -- and the Universe -- love her, no matter what. Everything else is just gravy.
I read this Chau article and said a silent thank you for my Western parents, seeing as the highlights of my childhood included playdates, sleepovers, and cheerleading. But I also found myself nodding in agreement a few times. My oldest daughter is in first grade and it is clear she is smart. I have high expectations for her and they will remain high. Hard work is something I value.
I think the parenting styles of “Chinese Mothers” have been brought into our awareness to illustrate the need for balance. Many Western children are coddled or given a sense of entitlement that works to their detriment (just ask any college professor who’s gotten a call from one of their student’s moms). I’ve also noticed a theme of equating a busy schedule with being a valued individual. We (Westerners) fill our kids’ days with “activities” without teaching them how to nurture their souls.
What we really need to do is teach our children that success requires hard work but also that our souls need connections, rest, and joyful expression to thrive. It’s the balance that creates wholeness!
Mrs. Chua quotes the study on the differences between Chinese mothers and Western ones as, ‘“academic achievement reflects successful parenting," and that if children did not excel at school then there was "a problem" and parents "were not doing their job."’ I’ve seen parents, from all societies, who look upon parenting as a “job”. Chinese mothers have taken this to the extreme, and it could be argued that they have excelled at it. For this western mother, I’ve never seen the raising of my children as a “job” -- parenting, to me, is not an INSTITUTION but a RELATIONSHIP.
While I’m working to guide, teach, educate, protect and love my children, I’m constantly reminding myself to open my magical mommy eyes to see the individual blooming before me: her dry humor, his kind heart, her moral indignity, his casual outlook. I believe they have as much to teach and share with me as I do with them, which would put my parenting style on the opposite spectrum as Mrs. Chua. How interesting it would be to compare our children in 20 years.
I read this article and had trouble wrapping not my brain, but my emotions around it. I couldn’t decide if I was sad for the children who are treated this way, angry at the parents' behavior, shocked that a highly intelligent mother had just been so public about her abusive treatment of her children -- or perhaps all three. If ever there was a polar opposite of a mother, here I am. My children's grades are not the most important aspect of school. I think socialization, play and experimenting are far more important that succeeding and being the “best”. When making a request of my children I always say, “please” -- because that is how I expect them to speak to other people. They have an open invitation to complain, or express their valuable opinion on any given topic -- because I believe in teaching emotional intelligence. I want my children to figure out who they are, what they want in life, and to create their definition of happiness -- whatever it means for them, not me.
What do YOU think? Is there a "right" way to parent? Do you identify more with the parenting style reflected in Amy Chua's article, or with any of the bloggers above? Was there a particular practice your parents employed in your childhood that you swear you'll never repeat with your children? What is your goal as a parent?
When you comment on an Owning Pink blog post, we invite you to be authentic and loving, to say what you feel, to hold sacred space so others feel heard, and to refrain from using hurtful or offensive language. Differing opinions are welcomed, but if you cannot express yourself in a respectful, caring manner, your comments will be deleted by the Owning Pink staff.
Comments
A response from the Child of a Tiger Mom
By Monica Wilcox on Thursday, 01/20/2011 at 3:47 PMThought you may be interested in reading the child's perspective on this type of parenting. http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/01/20/lac.su.tiger.mother.scars/index.ht...
Monica Wilcox
www.femmetales.com
https://twitter.com/Monica_Wilcox
How strict people can become rich
By Lorne Marr (not verified) on Tuesday, 01/18/2011 at 1:37 AMI wonder what the effect of the practices promoted in her book can be. But I am convinced it could only contribute to threatening the normal development of children. It seems to me the only purpose of this book is to boost the sales and earn a lot of money.
A Good Response
By April (not verified) on Saturday, 01/15/2011 at 3:46 PMThere's another article at the Wall Street Journal worth reading in response to the first.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870395910457608243418771625...
* Success will not make you happy.
* Happiness is the great human quest.
* Children have to find happiness themselves.
* It is better to have a happy, moderately successful child than a miserable high-achiever.
Let Them Shine Their Light
By April (not verified) on Saturday, 01/15/2011 at 2:27 PMI've seen reference to this article all week but just now read it. I am stunned. I am stunned by her need to feel superior and her belief that forcing her children into her little boxes is good mothering. I understand the light side of mothering to be holding space for our children's unfolding into the unique Divine Sparks they are meant to be.
I have to wonder about the psychological health of children who are raised to suppress their authenticity and aren't allowed to develop a wide range of relationships with peers. How are these girls prepared for the world of human relationship - friendships and romances?
I am entirely the opposite sort of parent than Amy Chua. I have primarily been a single mother and decided the way my children are raised. There were only two real rules enforced in our house: everyone contributes and we are kind to each other. I hardly forced my children to do anything at all, ever, except for homework and chores (education and contribution are vital to being successful humans). I also allowed them to do anything they desired that wasn't harmful or out of balance (there were limits on video games for instance). I did my best to pay attention to what they love doing and offered opportunities to explore their creative potential. And I let them navigate their own relationships, providing counsel when I could. I let my kids just be who they are and make choices for themselves (and live with the consequences of those choices).
The other thing I consciously chose to do was model being an evolving and authentic human being in a very open way. I share my journey with my kids as age appropriately as possible. I talk to them about life, relationships, community, leadership, service, the impact of culture, spirituality and creativity. I model a life in which I strive daily to be the best me I can be. I model a life of open-heartedness and loving people for who they are.
The result? I have a 20 year old son who got himself a full scholarship to Columbia University's Film Program and gets himself scholarships for film academy programs or an internship at the Cannes Film Festival during the summer. He's currently directing a grantfunded internet tv show about being queer young adults in today's culture.
Amy says kids don't want to work? My son has worked extremely hard since Freshman year of highschool out of pure desire for academics, writing, art, and film. He not only attended a rigorous academic and performing art academy that didn't really allow for a social life beyond working with his classmates by his own choice, but he produced their school magazine twice a year every year, maintained the school website, and was a prolific artist and writer. Had you seen him in public middle school he acted like an average boy who preferred video games to anything else. But for high school he chose an educational environment that inspired him to be all of who he is. That school operated on many of the same principles that I do, encouraging the teens to think for themselves and do what blisses them out.
I also have a 15 year old daughter who isn't so into academics but is an amazing photographer and has very high emotional intelligence. She's not real motivated at school and is barely passing classes with C's (she's been trying the same school my son went to and it isn't working for her), but she is spending time with her camera almost every day, researches photography, design, and fashion all the time, and she is amazing with people. She has different gifts than my son. Our hope is to move to the Bay area and find a school with an amazing visual arts program for her (and a new career direction for me).
When I became a mother, I am sure many assumed that I would raise broken children. I grew up in a crazy, addiction-filled, emotionally and financially impoverished home and had to overcome mental illness during my first mothering years (I had my son when I was 17). The psychological, emotional and spiritual health of my children is extremely important to me as a mother. My choices were based in having children who were not broken, but healthy and functional and capable of bringing amazing things into the world through their joy and belief in themselves. They are Divine Sparks who each have something special to offer me and the world. I can't imagine dampening that light with my own ideas of who they should be and what they should succeed at. What might Amy Chua's daughters bring into the world if they were allowed and encouraged to shine their own light as brightly as possible?
AMAZING
By Leslee Horner on Saturday, 01/15/2011 at 4:08 PMThank you for this comment April. Your children and YOU sound amazing! It seems you offered that balance that I think is so important. I also love how you mentioned the Divine Spark. I often think that if every child was told they held within them a Divine Spark that our world would be completely transformed. I am coming to believe more and more each day that one of my life purposes is to get this message out into the world and to children (esp. tweens and teens)! Right now I teach that age group at my Unity church and this is the first principle we teach them! Namaste and thank you so much for sharing!!!!
Love and Light,
Leslee
Visit my website: www.lesleehorner.com